Skip to main content

Korean Beauty Trends & Industry News: 25-06-24


CBD Ruled as Narcotic: Supreme Court Bans Cosmetic Imports Using Hemp-Derived Cannabidiol

    South Korea’s Supreme Court has ruled that cannabidiol (CBD), a compound extracted from the stalk of the cannabis plant, is still considered marijuana under the Narcotics Control Act. This decision confirms the legality of banning CBD imports for use in cosmetics, posing a significant impact on the domestic beauty industry.

The ruling stems from a case in which a cosmetics ingredient importer, Company A, requested a Standard Customs Clearance Report from the Korea Pharmaceutical Traders Association to import CBD for cosmetic use. The association rejected the application, citing CBD as a cannabis-derived substance. Company A filed a lawsuit seeking cancellation of the rejection.

Lower courts had initially sided with the company. The first and second instances concluded that since the Narcotics Control Act excludes cannabis seeds, roots, and stalks from its definition of marijuana, CBD extracted from stalk resin should not be regulated. The court noted that if the resin is derived solely from the stalk, it must be exempted from control.

However, the Supreme Court overturned those decisions. It emphasized that CBD is one of the primary active components of cannabis and should be classified as a controlled substance regardless of the part of the plant from which it is extracted. “Exempting CBD simply because it comes from the stalk contradicts the intent of the Narcotics Control Act,” the court stated.

This landmark decision sets a clear legal precedent in South Korea, reaffirming strict regulatory boundaries for the use of CBD in cosmetics. While other countries are embracing CBD for its anti-inflammatory, calming, and skin-soothing benefits, this ruling may curb local innovation and product diversification. Domestic beauty companies planning to develop or import CBD-based products must now reconsider raw material strategies or explore alternative compounds.


Fake K-Beauty Products Flood Market, Undermining Trust in Korean Brands

    As global demand for K-beauty continues to rise, counterfeit versions of popular Korean cosmetics are increasingly being distributed, damaging brand reputations and deceiving consumers.

One major case involves APR’s Medicube brand, which recently published a consumer alert warning about counterfeit products. These fake items are sold through open-market platforms disguised as legitimate storefronts. Sellers often copy product images and descriptions from Medicube’s official website, tricking consumers into purchasing fake goods.

Although the packaging and logo appear nearly identical to authentic products, differences emerge upon closer inspection—such as mismatched textures, misspelled product names, and incorrect measurements. For example, a counterfeit “Collagen Night Wrapping Mask” was labeled as “Golragen” and incorrectly marked its volume as “mi” instead of “ml.”

Other brands like Medipeel have also suffered from counterfeiting. Their best-selling “Red Lacto Collagen Wrapping Mask” has been widely copied and sold online. While the replicas look similar on the surface, they often lack brand labels, show blurry print quality, or use generic barcodes, revealing key inconsistencies.

Notably, this issue extends to many other renowned K-beauty labels such as Anua, Beauty of Joseon, TIRTIR, and Biodance, all of which have reported similar problems. These fake items are sold at prices nearly equal to or just slightly lower than genuine products, making it difficult for consumers to detect deception.

The bigger concern lies in the potential health risks. Counterfeits are often manufactured in unhygienic environments with unknown ingredients, posing dangers such as skin irritation or allergic reactions. On social platforms like TikTok, users have posted videos showing severe skin troubles caused by these knock-offs.

Industry insiders point to several factors driving the proliferation of counterfeits: the low barrier to entry in cosmetics manufacturing, the complexity of distribution channels including direct import and parallel imports, and the rise of e-commerce and social selling platforms that lack thorough oversight.

While some brands are responding with authentication systems and public awareness campaigns, many argue that stronger regulatory enforcement and cross-border cooperation are urgently needed to safeguard both consumers and the credibility of K-beauty worldwide.


APR Overtakes LG Household & Health Care in Market Cap – A Shift in Korea’s Beauty Industry Hierarchy

    A major reshuffling is taking place in Korea’s publicly listed beauty companies. APR, known for its synergy between skincare and beauty devices, has surpassed LG Household & Health Care (LG H&H) in market capitalization. On June 23, APR closed at a valuation of KRW 5.38 trillion, edging past LG H&H at KRW 5.34 trillion, making APR the second-largest beauty stock in Korea after Amorepacific (KRW 8.31 trillion).

When APR went public in February 2023, its initial market cap was KRW 1.89 trillion, meaning the company has grown 2.8 times in just 16 months. This meteoric rise is attributed to its flagship brand Medicube and its integrated portfolio that balances cosmetics and home-use beauty devices.

Approximately 60% of APR’s revenue comes from skincare products, with another 35% driven by beauty devices. This dual strategy has proven highly effective, particularly in international markets. In Q1 2025, APR recorded KRW 266 billion in revenue and KRW 54.6 billion in operating profit—representing 79% and 97% year-over-year growth, respectively.

A major differentiator is APR’s diversified global revenue: the U.S. contributes 27%, Japan 11%, Greater China 11%, and Europe & the Middle East 23%. This balanced global footprint minimizes regional risk and has become a model for scalable K-beauty success.

In contrast, LG H&H posted Q1 sales of KRW 1.69 trillion and operating profit of KRW 142.4 billion, reflecting a modest decline of 1.8% and 5.7% year-over-year. While still a heavyweight in the market, LG H&H’s growth has stagnated amid rising competition and shifting consumer dynamics.


LG H&H Responds with Pra.L Acquisition and New Beauty Device Launch

    Facing mounting competition from new players like APR, LG H&H is making strategic moves to reclaim momentum. The company recently acquired the premium beauty tech brand "Pra.L" from LG Electronics and introduced a new device—the “LG Pra.L Superform Galvanic Booster.”

The new product is a compact, lipstick-sized beauty tool measuring 9.5 cm in length and weighing just 47 grams, designed for portability and ease of use. Priced in the 100,000 KRW range, it is positioned as an accessible entry into high-performance beauty tech.

The device features galvanic microcurrent technology that enhances skin absorption of active ingredients, using a precise output of 250 μA. It also integrates a 630 nm wavelength LED to stimulate collagen production and offers 8,500 vibrations per minute for firming facial massage effects.

Alongside the device, LG H&H launched a dedicated skincare line called “GLASSLIKE,” tailored for use with beauty tech. The line includes three products addressing concerns like wrinkles, lip dryness, pigmentation, and sagging skin. Key ingredients like Vitamin C and bakuchiol are ionized for optimal compatibility with the device’s electrical delivery system.

With this launch, LG H&H aims to accelerate its push into “beauty intelligence,” combining cosmetics, devices, and artificial intelligence into a smart skincare ecosystem. By leveraging its deep R&D expertise in cosmetics and integrating cutting-edge technology, the company hopes to offer at-home solutions rivaling professional treatments.

An LG H&H spokesperson commented, “The new Pra.L will redefine beauty devices as the new normal, blending advanced technology with cosmetic efficacy. Our goal is to deliver professional-level skincare results at home, creating distinct value for consumers.”

This strategic pivot marks LG H&H’s response to APR’s rapid ascent and reflects the evolving landscape of Korea’s beauty sector—where innovation, agility, and technological integration are key to staying ahead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which sunscreen should I use, Inorganic or Organic?

Overview There are mainly two types of sunscreen: Physical and Chemical.  Inorganic sunscreens are also called Physical Sunscreen or Mineral Sunscreen. Organic sunscreens are also called Chemical Sunscreens. A term Inorganic and organic are derived from chemistry. * Organic Chemistry: The Study of Molecules Based on Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen * Inorganic Chemistry: The study of compounds other than organic chemicals A sunscreen can, of course, have both of these functions. It is called a Mixed sunscreen or a Combined sunscreen, and these days, many brands are developing products like this. Through this post, let's find out what inorganic and organic sunscreens are, and what sunscreens are most suitable for one to use. The difference between inorganic and organic sunscreen. Inorganic sunscreen is a sunscreen that forms a protective layer on the surface of the skin to block ultraviolet rays before they penetrate into the skin. Most product contains titanium dioxide and zinc oxid...

Misleading Claims in Microneedle Skincare Products: 82 Cases Identified

     Recently, microneedle skincare products have gained significant popularity, but Korea’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) has uncovered that over 80% of these products being sold online are making false or exaggerated claims. After reviewing 100 online posts, the MFDS found that 82 of them violated Korea’s cosmetics regulations, leading to requests for the posts to be blocked by the Korea Communications Standards Commission. The misleading advertisements primarily claimed that microneedles could penetrate deep into the skin layers or promised immediate pore reduction, both of which are not scientifically validated for general cosmetic products. Microneedles are a medical technology designed to deliver substances into the deeper layers of the skin, typically used in drugs and medical devices. However, in the cosmetics industry, these products generally do not have the same capabilities. Some companies falsely advertised their products as having effects similar t...

Korean Beauty Trends & Industry News: 24-05-08

Cosmax Leads in Cosmetics with New Hair Loss Evaluation Technology      Cosmax, a South Korean cosmetics company, has announced the development of a novel hair loss evaluation method using "hair and follicle mimicking organoids." This technology was showcased at the 2024 Organoid Developer Conference in Seongnam, Gyeonggi Province last month.  Organoids, made from stem cells, excellently replicate human cellular structure and function. In collaboration with OrganoidScience, Cosmax has successfully recreated androgenetic hair loss symptoms by introducing growth factors into reprogrammed stem cells to create a scalp mimic.  Furthermore, their proprietary ingredient "Soyact" has been validated for its effectiveness in suppressing male pattern baldness and received non-prescription functional certification from the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Cosmax sees this technology not only advancing hair loss treatment materials but also setting a new standard in ...